top of page
  • Writer's pictureSara Scott

Decoding Dog Training: Shifting the Conversation from Quadrants to Practicing 'Do No Harm’

Have you ever wondered about 'quadrants' in dog training? You've probably heard trainers mention them. Maybe you've been advised to seek a trainer who primarily uses one specific quadrant, like positive reinforcement, and avoids others, such as negative punishment. But what's the real significance of these quadrants in operant conditioning? How do they define a trainer's approach, and can understanding them help you find a skilled trainer?

Let's delve into a bit of science. In operant conditioning, there are four key quadrants that influence behavior: Positive Reinforcement, Positive Punishment, Negative Reinforcement, and Negative Punishment. 'Reinforcement' indicates that a behavior becomes stronger and more frequent, while 'Punishment' indicates that a behavior is less likely to occur and weakens. It's important to note that 'Positive' in this context means adding something to the environment, and 'Negative' refers to removing something. These terms do not imply moral judgments; neither punishment is inherently bad, nor is reinforcement inherently good.

Different emotions are typically associated with each of the learning theory's quadrants. When positive reinforcement is applied, the learner often experiences happiness. In contrast, negative punishment can lead to feelings of frustration. Negative reinforcement usually results in a sense of relief, whereas positive punishment tends to evoke unpleasant feelings in the learner. Although all these quadrants are scientifically based and influence behavior, it's crucial to consider the learner's emotional response, not just the behavioral outcome.

In the world of dog training, trainers often categorize themselves into different camps based on these quadrants. Some trainers might rely on a specific quadrant to justify their chosen methods and tools. There's a tendency to draw firm lines regarding which quadrants to use or avoid. However, this division can be somewhat arbitrary. Quadrants are, after all, a retroactive way to measure behavior. Skilled trainers recognize that understanding and managing antecedents—the factors that set the stage for behavior—are far more crucial than merely measuring behavior changes after they occur.

Quadrants can become even more intricate as they may shift from one to another depending on the specific behavior and measurement criteria. Consider a dog sitting by a fire on a chilly winter day. As the fire grows larger and warmer, the dog decides to move to a cooler spot on the other side of the cabin. Which quadrant is at play here? It actually depends on the behavior being measured. If we're assessing the behavior of 'staying next to the fire,' the increased heat (increase = positive) leads to a decrease in 'lying next to the fire' (decrease = punishment). Thus, looking at the data retrospectively, the intensified fire or warmth acts as positive punishment for the behavior of 'lying near the fire.' Are you following along with this explanation?

Consider the same scenario, but this time, let's focus on 'moving away from the fire' as the behavior of interest. When the dog gets up and relocates to a cooler area, it's seeking relief from the heat. This scenario represents negative reinforcement: the heat is reduced (decrease = negative), leading to an increase of moving away from the fire’ (increase = reinforcement). Looking back at the data after the behavior occurs, we can infer that the dog's movement away from the fire was reinforced by the decrease in heat.

This discussion might seem overwhelming or complex, almost like a jumble of terms, and to an extent, it is. However, understanding these quadrants is crucial, as they're underpinned by evidence-based best practices. It's important to remember that quadrants aren't inherently good or bad; they're simply tools for understanding behavior. Rather than fixating on a retroactive measurement system, our focus should be on applying evidence-based best practices in dog training.

Antecedents play a crucial role in training. They set the stage for the desired behavior. Asking questions like 'Has the dog exercised? Is its health in good condition? Is the environment conducive to the behavior we're trying to encourage?' is vital. The most effective and ethical approach to teaching behavior is through reinforcement. Should you come across a trainer whose primary method to addressing behavior is punishment, it's strongly recommended to consider other options. This issue is prevalent across the spectrum of training styles, encompassing not only physical punishment but also tactics like ignoring the dog, using time-outs, or retroactively addressing behaviors. Such methods range from suboptimal to outright unethical.

Let's move beyond using quadrants as a justification for the methods and tools we use in dog training, and instead adopt a code of ethics as is common in other professional fields. The primary principle should be 'do no harm.' It is more important that your training plan is consciously designed to avoid causing harm to the dog, rather than focusing on which quadrant it fits into. Inflicting pain or fear on dogs in the name of training is unacceptable, regardless of its scientific categorization.

When searching for a trainer, prioritize those who adhere to evidence-based best practices and operate with a philosophy of 'do no harm.' Be cautious of trainers who heavily debate quadrants or use them as a selling point for their services. Such discussions often contribute to division within the field and fail to provide clear indications of what the trainer will or won't do with your dog.

In conclusion, while the concept of quadrants in dog training provides a framework for understanding behavior, it's essential to look beyond these categories to the broader picture of ethical and effective training. The focus should always be on creating a clear learning environment for the dog, emphasizing reinforcement over punishment, and considering the dog's emotional and physical well-being. When selecting a trainer, choose someone who aligns with these principles, using evidence-based practices and operating with a commitment to 'do no harm.' By prioritizing these values, we can ensure that dog training is not only effective but also fosters a healthy relationship between dogs and their trainers, ultimately contributing to more significant advances in the field and resulting in long-lasting behavior change in our dogs.


Now that you've read about moving beyond operant conditioning quadrants and prioritizing 'do no harm' in dog training, are you ready to implement these ethical practices yourself? Click here to learn about my personalized evidence-based training services, tailored to each dog's unique needs. You'll see how my compassionate approach centered on the science of learning can transform your relationship with your dog.

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page